For Immediate Release November 4, 1996
The Kick-Back Racket:
Performance Management and
Recognition System
by
Paul Andrew Mitchell
All Rights Reserved
(October 1996)
It is becoming increasing apparent, in large part because of
a conspiracy of silence which has descended upon the District of
Columbia in recent months, that President Clinton has a lot of
explaining to do, in quite a few executive departments. One of
the best suppressed stories of his administration thus far is
evidence of White House kick-backs from the Internal Revenue
Service ("IRS") for each and every indictment issued by federal
grand juries against "illegal tax protestors," whatever they are.
The term itself is an oxymoron, because protest has never
been illegal in America. Protest is even recognized by the
federal government's precious Uniform Commercial Code for
repudiating presentments in a lawful manner. So, for the phrase
"illegal tax protestor" to withstand the obvious constitutional
challenge (yes, the First Amendment is still the supreme Law in
America), the adjective "illegal" must modify the noun "tax."
This is a telling admission on the part of our vaulted Congress
of what many Americans have known for a long time, namely, the
federal income tax is a total and utter fraud, from stem to
stern. Our Ship of State is a sieve at sea that's riddled with
loop-holes and sinking fast.
What makes this term even more obnoxious is the way in which
the IRS now attacks American "rebels" who dare to learn and speak
the truth. A key page from the Internal Revenue Manual ("IRM")
clearly shows that the President routinely receives $35,000 from
the Performance Management and Recognition System ("PMRS"). We
have a political prisoner in federal custody right now who is
prepared to testify that the President receives this sum each and
every time a federal grand jury issues an indictment against any
illegal tax protestor ("ITP"). U.S. Attorneys receive a mere
$25,000 per indictment of ITP's.
Now, if the Department of Justice ("DOJ") has a secret task
force in place to attack ITP's who've become organized, like the
former Pilot Connection Society which has been reported to have
over 5,000 members, the President stands to rake in a tidy sum if
his hench-persons in the DOJ succeed in bringing grand jury
indictments against all 5,000. Let's see, 5,000 times $35,000
equals $175,000,000. The bad news for President Clinton is that
the IRM provides absolutely no authority for these "performance
recognition rewards" (read "kick-backs"). Courts have
consistently ruled that the IRM has no more authority than a
pizza recipe, when it comes to authorizing salaries and other
compensation for federal government employees. Federal employee
salaries must be determined by Acts of Congress, and the IRM is a
far cry from that high standard of law.
Furthermore, the Constitution forbids the President from
receiving any other "emoluments" during his term of office. See
Article II, Section 1, Clause 7: "... he shall not receive within
that Period any other Emolument from the United States, or any of
them." A FOIA request by this author for all PMRS records
produced an admission, on Treasury Department letterhead, that
some records do not exist because the rewards were paid in cash.
This is bad enough. But, when you couple these kick-backs with
the perjury racket now rampant within the Department of Just US,
and with a grand jury system which badly needs either complete
overhaul or abolition, you quickly find that the indictments
issuing from federal grand juries, for alleged violations of the
Internal Revenue Code, are really threats, engineered by the
biggest extortion racket this planet has ever seen. Jury
tampering, perjury, and obstruction of justice are terms which do
a far better job of describing what is really going on.
In one recent grand jury case, involving a subpoena for
certain books and records, a federal judge in Arizona conspired
with the Assistant U.S. Attorney ("AUSA") to commit 27 counts of
mail fraud, 27 counts of jury tampering, 27 counts of obstruction
of justice, and 27 counts of conspiracy to commit all of the
above. When a formal request was submitted to that grand jury to
investigate probable violations of federal law by the AUSA, the
judge intercepted this certified request, and all subsequent
pleadings which were then directed to the grand jury by Counsel
in order to keep them informed of what was really going on.
These pleadings contained crucial evidence -- you guessed it --
of the PMRS kick-back racket, and of a pattern of pathological
lying by the AUSA dating back to a $4,797 fine imposed on him for
repeatedly lying to a federal court in Phoenix. This was
unprecedented for federal courts who almost never eat their own.
Last but not least, the evidence is now overwhelming that
the law which Congress enacted to qualify and convene all juries,
both grand and trial, is horribly defective for exhibiting
obvious class bias against state Citizens who are not also
federal citizens. The courts have consistently ruled that
Americans can be state Citizens without also being federal
citizens, whether or not the federal government's precious
Fourteenth Amendment was properly approved and adopted (and we
now know that it was not). Unfortunately for Congress, this
class discrimination in the Jury Selection and Service Act, Title
28 United States Code Sections 1861 thru 1865, invalidates each
and every federal grand jury indictment, and each and every
federal trial jury verdict, ever since the end of the Civil War.
The United States is now in very deep trouble for putting so
many Americans in federal prisons, with absolutely no lawful
authority whatsoever to do so. Couple that with the fact that
the U.S. incarceration rate is twice as high as it is in South
Africa, which is second world-wide in prisoners per capita.
Do you think maybe that the federal government may be
running an extortion racket here, just for money? I think so. I
know so. I can prove it. I am appalled.
Common Law Copyright
Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Counselor at Law, federal witness
and Citizen of Arizona state
All Rights Reserved without Prejudice
November 4, 1996
email: supremelawfirm@yahoo.com
website: http://supremelaw.org
Related correspondence:
FOIA Request for PMRS Records, July 26, 1996
FOIA Appeal for PMRS Records, August 22, 1996
Letter to Ninth Circuit Judge, September 3, 1996
Letter from IRS Tax Law Specialist, September 12, 1996
Letter to IRS Tax Law Specialist, September 19, 1996
Letter to IRS Counsel Gerald R. Ryan, November 5, 1996
Letter to Special Prosecutor in re Pres. Clinton, November 5, 1996
# # #
Return to Table of Contents for
Published Press Releases